Hey everyone, Recently we've had some discussions about report abuse threads and how they can lead to grey areas with very limited 'evidence' especially regarding killstealing and not respecting the mapowner and his or her wishes. We would like to suggest a new format regarding killstealing and mapownership specifically to improve the quality of life in the game. We believe that changing this format would result in: more civil and understanding conversations between players so it wouldn't even result into a report it would make reporting much more of a hassle so less people would report 'for the sake of it' even though their problem already got solved clarifying that mapowner is final, including the cases of area bosses, and that a player may hold more than one channel at a time if they are able to do so. This will not be considered as breaking the rules and will not be reportable. Currently this is what we ask of a player before they can submit their report abuse thread in general: The format we are now adapting to for killstealing reports: Character Name: (your own character name) Name(s) of the character(s) you are reporting: (offender's name(s)) Offence committed: Killstealing Details: (explain the incident as clearly as possible and in as much detail as possible so that we have sufficient evidence to make an informed decision) Please include multiple unedited and entire screenshots with your report. Edited or partial screenshots will not be accepted as evidence. You can also submit video evidence if you feel it clarifies things better. The screenshots should include: You asking a person to leave as you would prefer that they didn't train there with you or loot your items, just saying: 'cc (plz)' is not accepted. Time stamps (using the ~servertime command) of at least two minutes apart OR screenshots showing a difference in the boss's HP and the person still actively killstealing you despite your attempts to make them aware that killstealing is unwanted. Killstealing reports that do not provide us with this evidence will not be considered. As always, if you have any feedback regarding this, you can let us know in our feedback section.